A 70-year-old Lord of the Rings book line makes me worry about Gollum’s hunting.

A 70 year old line from JRR Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings Quite worrying when it comes The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum. An upcoming prequel to be directed by Golem actor Andy Serkis and produced by Peter Jackson, The Hunt for Gollum Its story details are highlighted. Although based on Jackson’s trilogy the hobbit Lazy and ring of power Season 2 is uneven at best. Middle-earth fans are tentatively excited about the return of Tolkien’s beloved world Led by some familiar faces.

to give When the Hunt for Gollum takes place in LOTRIts timeline, it’s hard to say whether the movie will cover new plot points. Before becoming a ring-warped creature known as Gollum, the film’s title character was a hobbit named Smeagol. On his birthday, Smeagol discovers a ring at the bottom of a river. After killing his cousin”precious,” Sméagol occupied it for the next 500 years or soSpent most of his century in a cave in the Misty Mountains. Unfortunately, one LOTR The line makes it Hunt for Gollum The timing is more worrisome.

An Aragorn line in The Lord of the Rings raises questions about Gollum’s hunting

Aragorn implies that nothing important happened while he was tracking Gollum

Tolkien’s first Lord of the Rings novel, Fellowship of the RingAragorn says something that raises many questions about The Hunt for GollumIts narrative. During the Council of Elrond, Chief Lord of the Rings One of the characters discusses the ring. While deciding what to do with the Dark Lord Sauron’s all-powerful and manipulative object, Aragorn shares some information from his time as a ranger. His friend Bilbo Baggins’ magic ring, suspicious of the wizard Gandalf tasks Aragorn with finding the slave — the creature that, supposedly, found a ring later it was no longer Isildur’s burden.

During the Council of Elrond at Rivendell, Aragorn admits that “No need to say anything“The perils I encountered while hunting slaves. A few lines later, the ranger expands on that comment, noting that his time spent following Gollum, and what the hobbit had become, was the worst part of his journey. Apparently, it was difficult for Aragorn to see the broken slave waste after being completely twisted. One Ring of Sauron. However, Aragorn’s lines also imply that nothing more important happened during Gollum’s quest, which is a huge problem for Serkis’ movie.

The Hunt for Gollum had to change the JRR Tolkien lore to live up to the previous films

Andy Serkis’ Gollum movie needs to raise the stakes

if The Hunt for Gollum Wanting to justify his own existence, Tolkien’s lore must change for the upcoming movie. Although its author The Lord of the Rings And the hobbit Doesn’t go into detail about Gollum’s time with the ring, aside How long did Gollum have one ring?It’s clear that the author didn’t think anything too significant, otherwise, Aragorn would probably have mentioned more about his hunting time. In order to show how all-encompassing the influence of the One Ring is, Gollum’s time with the ring didn’t require a ton of fleshing out.

Misty accomplishes what Tolkien wanted to do with the character’s story, by leaving Gollum’s waste on the mountain, eating raw fish and goblin flesh. Readers don’t need to know much more: the once simple life of a hobbit named Smeagol twists into untold suffering as he is drawn to the One Ring. if anything, Tolkien’s passages about Gollum show how important the destruction of the One Ring is – and Aragorn’s memories of his time with Gollum repeat this. Nevertheless, if something more interesting should happen Hunt for Gollum Plan to have attractive bets.

The description of Aragorn’s slave hunt doubles my fears about the film

Gollum’s story doesn’t sound like much to tell in a standalone movie

So far, Gollum’s story doesn’t sound like something that needs to be told in isolation Lord of the Rings the movie. Aragorn’s description of his time spent hunting slaves confirms this line of thinking. Not every story is worth telling in the feature-length film formatBut, unfortunately, Hollywood’s insistence on milking beloved franchises and IPs overwhelms any legitimate artistic or storytelling concerns. By Peter Jackson the hobbit Trilogy is actually a solid example of this LOTR Franchisees make huge mistakes in the name of profit.

Although the hobbit The trilogy has some tough moments and creative choices, There was absolutely no reason to break a 300-page novel into six hours of silver-screen material.. The decision to turn the book into something more epic has resulted in a bloated trilogy – one that takes away from the enduring story at its center. In the same vein, The Hunt for Gollum Feels like a hollow concept – a prequel that capitalizes on the audience’s nostalgia and doesn’t add anything meaningful to it. Lord of the Rings suffrage